Internet Info 1993/Internet Info CD-ROM (Walnut Creek) (1993).iso/networking/terms/kermit/d/cdcker.bwr

Text File | 1988-08-16 | 11.8 KB | 296 lines

 3-Oct-84 00:15:54-EDT,5823;000000000001
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from amelia.ARPA (AMELIA-EC.ARPA.#Internet) by CU20B.ARPA with TCP; Wed 3 Oct 84 00:15:36-EDT
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 84 21:17:19 pdt
From: Dave Tweten <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Received: by amelia.ARPA; Tue, 2 Oct 84 21:17:19 pdt
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Subject: 170Kermit on NOS 2.3, Bug Fixes
Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail]

     In a selfish attempt to get Kermit implemented on a machine I
occasionally use, some time back I gave a copy of the latest 170Kermit
to a friend at CDC's Sunnyvale installation, Ted Brown.  I succeeded
beyond my greatest expectation.  Not only does it work well on the
Sunnyvale CDC machines, but Ted offered to let me relay what he learned
about 170Kermit back to Info-Kermit.

     If you wish to communicate to Ted through the net (CDC Sunnyvale
isn't connected), feel free to relay the message through me.

     What follows is Ted's message:

Date:  2 October 1984
To:    [e-mail]
       [e-mail]
       [e-mail]
From:  Ted Brown, Control Data Corporation
Subject:  Corrections to Kermit-170 Version 2.2 for NOS

I recently received a copy of Kermit-170 Version 2.2 and encountered
some problems when installing and executing it in the standard release
of NOS Version 2.3 (PSR Level 617).  Following is a description of each
problem, and attached to this letter is a NOS CCL procedure that
properly installs Kermit-170 with corrections for all the problems.
The procedure assumes the existence of a direct access permanent file
named KERMITS that contains the UPDATE source for the Kermit PL in the
first logical record and the source for the AZLIB PL in the second.

1.  The installation instructions in the documentation file are missing
    some parameters and control statements.
2.  Assembly errors occur due to incorrect usage of quotation marks and
    apostrophes in micro definitions.
3.  The default data mode (DISPLAY) is inconvenient.  ASCII would be
    more appropriate for the majority of file transfers.
4.  The terminal parameters for PW, PG, and EB are not restored after
    terminating binary mode.  Although it is not possible to determine
    their original values, they could be set to something with less
    negative impact for the majority of users.
5.  Subroutine CONBUFF aborts if Kermit is not compiled with OPT=0 due
    to an instruction that is overwritten by subroutine CFE when it
    clears the FET that is adjacent to CONBUFF's entry point.
6.  Single-character inputs are incorrectly processed.  Specifically, a
    question mark for help is not recognized due to a parsing error in
    subroutine CONBUFF.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about my code.
Thank you very much for the excellent job that you are doing to support
and distribute Kermit!

Ted Brown
Central Software Support
Control Data Corporation
215 Moffett Park Drive
Sunnyvale, California  94089

408/744-5521
800/328-9567
________________________________________________________________________

.PROC,KERMITI.
ASSIGN,MS,OUTPUT.
ATTACH,KERMITS.
ATTACH,KERMIT/M=W.
UPDATE,I=KERMITS,N=KERMUPL.
UPDATE,I=KERMITS,N=AZLBUPL.
UPDATE,F,P=AZLBUPL,I=KERMITM.
COMPASS,I,S=PSSTEXT,S=SYSTEXT,A.
LIBGEN,P=AZLIB.
UPDATE,F,P=KERMUPL,I=KERMITM.
REWIND,LGO.
FTN5,I,S=PSSTEXT,S=SYSTEXT,OPT=2.
FTN5,I,S=PSSTEXT,S=SYSTEXT,B=LIBREL,OPT=2.
LIBGEN,F=LIBREL,P=KERMLIB.
LDSET,MAP=SBEX.
LOAD,LGO.
NOGO,KERMIT.
DAYFILE,,KERMITI.
RENAME,KERMITL=OUTPUT.
REVERT.KERMITI.
EXIT.
DAYFILE,,KERMITI.
RENAME,KERMITL=OUTPUT.
REVERT,ABORT.KERMITI.
.DATA,KERMITM.
*ID EWB840918
*/
*/  EXCHANGE QUOTES AND APOSTROPHES THAT CAUSED ASSEMBLY ERRORS
*/
*D MACREL.947
 ^%S'MCS1 MICRO  1,, S
*D MACREL.950
 ^%S'MCS1 MICRO  1,, T
*D MACREL.954
 ^%S'MCS2 MICRO  1,, S
*D MACREL.957
 ^%S'MCS2 MICRO  1,, T
*D MACREL.960
          RJ     =X"^%S'MCS1"X"^%S'MCS2">
*D MACREL.1048
 ^%S'MCS1 MICRO  1,, S
*D MACREL.1051
 ^%S'MCS1 MICRO  1,, T
*D MACREL.1055
 ^%S'MCS2 MICRO  1,, S
*D MACREL.1058
 ^%S'MCS2 MICRO  1,, T
*D MACREL.1061
          RJ     =X"^%S'MCS1"X"^%S'MCS2">
.EOR.
*ID EWB840918
*/
*/  DEFINE STANDARD NOS SYSTEM
*/
*DF NOS
*DF OTHER
*DF 642CSET
*DF OVCAP
*ID EWB840930
*/
*/  CHANGE DEFAULT DATA MODE FROM DISPLAY TO ASCII
*/
*D KERMIT.709
      DATA DSKCSET / DSKNOS8 /
*D KERMIT.1207
     +INS 8-BIT ^A^S^C^I^I DATA.  ^THE DEFAULT IS ^A^S^C^I^I.\N\N')
*D KERMLIB.2513
      INTEGER  NOSITM(5), NOSTTM(3), NOSFULL, NOSHALF,
*/
*/  RESTORE PW, PG, AND EB PARAMETERS AFTER TERMINATING BINARY MODE
*/
*D KERMLIB.2517
C          SET PW=0,CI=0,LI=0,PG=N,UBL=15,UBZ=200,EB=EL,FA=Y,CP=N,LK=Y
*D KERMLIB.2524
C           SET PW=80,PG=Y,EB=EB,FA=N,CP=Y,LK=N
*D KERMLIB.2526
      DATA  NOSTTM / O"00164043412040454001", O"41014002406740004107",
     +               O"40014040400000000000" /
*D KERMLIB.2636
            CALL WRITEW(FETS(0,STDOUT),NOSTTM, 3)
*ID EWB841001
*/
*/  ELIMINATE RUNTIME ABORT THAT OCCURRED IF NOT COMPILED WITH OPT=0
*/
*D KERMLIB.3701
CFEA      BSSZ   5           FAKE FET
*/
*/  CORRECTLY PROCESS ALL SINGLE-CHARACTER INPUTS (E.G., QUESTION MARK)
*/
*D KERMLIB.3765
      LPS = 12
.EOR.
*ID DEBUG
*/
*/  TEMPORARY CHANGES FOR TESTING PURPOSES
*/
*D KERMIT.7
*D KERMIT.568,KERMIT.572
*D KERMLIB.3710
      DATA  CONBUG / .TRUE. /
________________________________________________________________________

     That's the end of Ted's message.  Let me add that if you accept
Ted's proposed change of the default character code, a change will be
required in the documentation for SET DATA-MODE.
13-Feb-86 07:14:35-EST,1603;000000000001
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from ngp.UTEXAS.EDU by CU20B.COLUMBIA.EDU with TCP; Thu 13 Feb 86 07:14:30-EST
Posted-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 86 12:08:33 cst
Received: from walt.UTEXAS.EDU by ngp.UTEXAS.EDU (4.22/4.22)
    id AA18990; Wed, 12 Feb 86 12:10:36 cst
Received: from huey.UTEXAS.EDU by walt.UTEXAS.EDU (2.0/4.22)
    id AA20790; Wed, 12 Feb 86 12:10:11 cst
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 86 12:08:33 cst
From: [e-mail] (Jim Knutson)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Received: by huey.UTEXAS.EDU (2.0/4.22)
    id AA09452; Wed, 12 Feb 86 12:08:33 cst
To: [e-mail]
Subject: THE FROG for 64-bit CDC's?

I am no longer working with Cybers anymore so my support of Cyber Kermit
has become rather limited.  I would like to see support for it continue
on a "real" Cyber site (not this homegrown OS stuff).  Basically, the
support needed is finish server support and be willing to write tapes
for other CDC sites.  Perhaps a general cleanup of all the nasty
conditional code is in order also.  Anyone willing to take this on should
contact me to obtain all the materials I have.

It is interesting to see that other sites are writing Kermits to run
on CDC equipment.  I can understand writing in Pascal but writing one
in Compass makes me shudder.  I have had to support several Compass
programs in the past and it is a nightmare when trying to make mods.
I wish them all the luck in the world in that endeavor.

Jim Knutson
ARPA: [e-mail]
UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,kpno,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!knutson
Phone: [phone]
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 86 00:34:12 edt
From: Don Barry <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]

In response to your request for evaluations of the existing cyber 170 series
kermits, we have installed both kermits at this site (running cdc 855 and 990 m
machines).  The fortran kermit (from UT) is specific to their system in
many ways because they run a homebrew operating system (taurus) instead of
NOS.  this even has a unique character set, posing formidable conversion tasks.
it was done here, but the results were not impressive - inefficient in speed,
occasional bugs.  A systems programmer wrote a kermit for local use in CDC
CYBIL (a high level systems programming language) but it is bug-ridden and
of comparable efficiency to UT kermit.  If you'd like a copy, he can probably
be persuaded to part with one - his address on bitnet is CC100td TD at GITVM1.
Overall, the clear winner is Manchester KERMIT in CDC COMPASS.  THis is
very well written, modular, commented well, and 5 times faster than either of
the previous CDC kermits.  Its only deficiency is requirement of parity
specification at compile time and inability to do 8-bit transfers without
quoting.  These should be easy enough to add - even without, it is far and
above the best-designed kermit for CDC equipment.  The CYBIL version, after
appropriate debugging and efficiency enhancement, will prove eventually
worth supporting, as it will run under NOS/VE without major change, whereas
the assembly version will be useless.

Don Barry (Chemistry Dept)          CSnet: [e-mail]
Georgia Institute of Technology    BITNET: CMPBSDB @ GITVM1
Atlanta, GA 30332      ARPA: [e-mail]
UUCP: ...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!cmpbsdb
 1-Oct-86 18:35:35-EDT,1494;000000000001
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from ngp.UTEXAS.EDU by CU20B.COLUMBIA.EDU with TCP; Wed 1 Oct 86 18:35:31-EDT
Posted-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 86 10:46:01 cdt
Received: from huey.cc.utexas.edu by ngp.UTEXAS.EDU (4.22/4.22)
    id AA16558; Wed, 1 Oct 86 16:59:07 cdt
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 86 10:46:01 cdt
From: [e-mail] (Jim Knutson)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Received: by huey.cc.utexas.edu (2.2/4.22)
    id AA13674; Tue, 30 Sep 86 10:46:01 cdt
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re:  [Christine M Gianone <[e-mail]>: [Don Barry <[e-mail]>:]]
Cc: [e-mail]

I haven't used any of the other Cyber Kermits.  I do admit that the FORTRAN
version is fairly slow (~50% of the baud rate) and that it has lots of
system dependencies in it.  However, it is/has been ported to NOS/BE, NOS 1.x,
NOS 2.x, and UT-2D and it contains conversion code for several of the
character sets that CDC has chosen to inflict upon its users.

The draw back is that I haven't been working on a Cyber (or Cyber Kermit)
for over a year now.  The person that has been handling the requests
we get for Cyber Kermit is William Reeder ([e-mail]).  I'm
not sure if he is supporting it beyond writing tapes for distribution.
In terms of support and ease of porting, the COMPASS version may be best
for other CDC sites with "standard" operating systems.

Jim Knutson
11-Aug-87 14:41:36-EDT,1425;000000000001
Mail-From: SY.KEN created at 11-Dec-86 15:05:35
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from ngp.utexas.edu by CU20B.COLUMBIA.EDU with TCP; Thu 11 Dec 86 15:05:58-EST
Posted-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 86 14:02:15 cst
Received: by ngp.utexas.edu (5.51/5.51)
    id AA01452; Thu, 11 Dec 86 14:06:04 CST
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 86 14:02:15 cst
From: [e-mail] (Jim Knutson)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Received: by huey.cc.utexas.edu (2.2/4.22)
    id AA12834; Thu, 11 Dec 86 14:02:15 cst
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re:  [Steve Roseman <[e-mail]>: More on Multiple CDC Kermits]
Cc: [e-mail]

Personally, I feel that the CDC versions of kermit for the version I wrote
(the fortan version), should probably be split into seperate versions.
The code for trying to manage several operating systems and approximately
5 different character sets is horrendous.  I would be in favor of ripping
out all non-nos code (that means NOS/BE and, sniff, UT-2D).  A NOS/VE version
will probably have to be done seperately because of the word size differences
and all.  I have not had many calls from NOS/BE sites lately and very few
calls from NOS/VE sites as well.

However, I must say that I really haven't been maintaining the Cyber version
of Kermit for quite a while now so perhaps my suggestions should be tempered
by that.